The short answer
These two aren't really the same kind of bike — and that's the whole decision. The Stark Varg is a $11,990 full-factory electric motocross racer with up to 80 hp. Sur-Ron builds versatile, lighter, far cheaper trail-and-moto bikes with the deepest support network in the segment.
So the honest verdict is simple: if you race motocross, buy the Varg. If you don't, buy a Sur-Ron. On our VoltRipper Score, the Sur-Ron Storm Bee (96) edges the Varg MX (95) and the Ultra Bee (94) sits within a point of it — not because the Varg is slow, but because it's a specialized, expensive, closed-course tool, and the Score rewards value, versatility, and support, not just horsepower. Stark's road-legal Varg EX scores 97, a point clear of the Storm Bee, and legality is most of why.
Why people cross-shop them
The Varg landed as the halo bike of the electric dirt world — 80 hp, app-tunable, genuinely competitive with gas 450s — so it shows up in every "fastest electric dirt bike" conversation next to Sur-Ron, the brand that created the category. But they're built for different riders, and most of the pages comparing them are published by shops that sell one or both. We sell neither, so we'll tell you the truth: for the vast majority of people asking this question, the Varg is more bike than the job needs.
The core matchup
| Stark Varg MX | Sur-Ron Storm Bee | Sur-Ron Light Bee X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VoltRipper Score | 95 | 96 | 89 |
| Price | $11,990 | $8,999 | $4,400 |
| Peak power | 60 kW (80 hp) | 22.5 kW | 10 kW |
| Battery | 7,200 Wh | 5,720 Wh | 2,520 Wh |
| Top speed | 68 mph | 68.3 mph | 50 mph |
| Weight | 260 lb | 280 lb | 130 lb |
| Street-legal | No (closed course) | Kit | Kit |
| Type | Full-race MX | Full-size trail/moto | Light trail |
Head-to-head, factor by factor
Power → Stark Varg, by a mile. The Varg's 60 kW peak is roughly triple any Sur-Ron, and its party trick — app-adjustable 10–80 hp — means one bike scales from a beginner trainer to a factory race weapon. Nothing Sur-Ron makes touches it on raw output. The catch: it's far more power than almost anyone riding trails can actually use.
Top speed → Sur-Ron Storm Bee. Counterintuitively, the Storm Bee's official 68.3 mph edges the Varg's 68 — a rounding error rather than a gap, but notable given the Varg makes nearly three times the power. Top speed is set by gearing, not watts: the Varg is geared for motocross acceleration, not flat-out pace, and geared for speed it will run far past either figure.
Race capability & suspension → Stark Varg. This is what the money buys: a full-size MX chassis with genuine race-grade suspension, built to line up at a gate. On a motocross track, no Sur-Ron is in the conversation.
Price & value → Sur-Ron, decisively. The Storm Bee is about $3,000 cheaper; the Light Bee X is roughly a third of the Varg's price. For what most riders do, that gap buys nothing you'll use on the Varg.
Versatility → Sur-Ron. Sur-Rons trail ride, commute, and take a street-legal kit, and the lineup spans light-and-flickable (Light Bee X) to full-size power (Storm Bee). The Varg is a one-job bike: race the track.
Aftermarket & support → Sur-Ron, decisively. This is the moat. Sur-Ron has the biggest parts catalog, widest dealer network, and largest owner community in the class. Stark's ecosystem is newer and still maturing. Years into ownership, that difference is what actually matters.
Street-legal potential -> depends which Stark. Every Sur-Ron can take a lighting/registration kit where a state allows it. The Varg MX in this comparison is a closed-course machine. Road riders should look at Stark's separate Varg EX enduro or SM road variant instead of trying to make the MX trim into something it is not.
The middle path most people miss: Sur-Ron Ultra Bee
If the Varg tempts you because you want power but you're not actually racing, look hard at the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee (Score 94, $6,499). Current HP listings put it around 24.5 kW peak and 59 mph, so it does not match the Varg's top-speed number — but it weighs far less (195 lb), takes a street kit, and rides on Sur-Ron's whole support ecosystem for less than half the Varg's price. For the rider who wants serious punch without the race-bike premium, it's the smarter buy than either extreme. (Full review →)
First, which Varg? The MX and the EX are not the same bike
"Stark Varg" is two machines, and most comparisons — including most of the ones you'll find elsewhere — quietly pick one and never say which.
| Varg MX 1.2 | Varg EX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11,990 | $13,040 |
| Peak power | 60 kW (80 hp) | 60 kW (80 hp) |
| Wheel torque | 978 N·m | 1,036 N·m |
| Battery | 7,200 Wh | 7,200 Wh |
| Top speed | 68 mph | not published |
| Claimed range | 50 mi | not published |
| Weight | 260 lb | 264 lb |
| Seat height | 37.8 in | 38.0 in |
| Built for | closed-course motocross | road-legal enduro |
| VoltRipper Score | 95 | 97 |
The MX is the race bike — closed-course, no lights, the one that wins the "best electric motocrosser" argument. The EX is the enduro: same powertrain, factory lighting, and a road-legal path where your state allows it. That legality is why the EX scores three points higher despite costing $1,050 more.
And here is the thing nobody else will tell you: Stark publishes no top speed and no range figure for the EX. It is the most expensive bike we track at $13,040, and two of the three numbers a buyer asks first are simply absent from the spec sheet. We leave both fields null rather than borrow the MX's — the powertrain is shared, but gearing, weight and tyres are not, and an inherited number is a guess wearing a decimal point.
So when a spec sheet says "Stark Varg, 80 hp," check which one. Both make 80 hp. Only one of them will tell you how fast it goes.
Which should you buy?
- You race motocross (or seriously train for it): Stark Varg. It's the best electric MX bike made, full stop. (Review →)
- You want the best all-around full-size e-moto: Sur-Ron Storm Bee (Score 96) — far cheaper, street-kit-capable, best-supported, and level with the Varg on stock top speed. (Review →)
- You want big power without the halo price: Sur-Ron Ultra Bee (Score 94, $6,499) — the value-power sweet spot. (Review →)
- First serious bike / value / most riders: Sur-Ron Light Bee X ($4,400) — lighter, approachable, superbly supported. (Review →)
Not sure which fits your size, skill, and riding? Run the Find Your Ride configurator.
The honest bottom line
The Stark Varg is an extraordinary machine — the benchmark electric motocrosser and worth every dollar if you race. But "more powerful" isn't "better for you." For trail riders, commuters, and first-time buyers — which is almost everyone — a Sur-Ron is more usable bike for far less money, with a street-kit path and a support network the Varg can't match. That's why two Sur-Rons outscore the Varg on our board. Don't buy $11,990 of race bike to ride the local trails.
VoltRipper is independent — we don't sell Stark, Sur-Ron, or any bike, and our Score is based on verified specs, not who pays us. Affiliate disclosure is included on monetized pages, and we're spec-verified/data-driven rather than hands-on until first-hand testing exists.
FAQ
Is the Stark Varg better than a Sur-Ron?
For racing motocross, yes — nothing Sur-Ron makes competes with the Varg's 80 hp and race suspension on a track. For everything else — value, versatility, support, and street-legal potential — a Sur-Ron is the better bike, which is why the Storm Bee scores 96 on our board to the Varg MX's 95.
Is the Stark Varg worth $11,990?
If you actually race motocross, it's a genuine bargain against a factory gas 450 — it's the best electric MX bike made. If you trail ride, commute, or ride recreationally, no: a Sur-Ron gives you more usable bike for a third to two-thirds of the price, plus a street-kit path and a far deeper support network.
Stark Varg vs Sur-Ron Storm Bee — what's the difference?
The Varg MX makes about three times the peak power (60 kW vs 22.5 kW) with real race suspension and app-adjustable output, but costs $2,991 more and is not street-legal. The Storm Bee is cheaper, takes a street-legal kit, and has the deepest support in the class; on top speed the two are effectively level (68.3 vs 68 mph in stock gearing). Storm Bee for versatility; Varg MX for the track. Stark's Varg EX is the separate road-legal enduro.
How many watts is a Stark Varg?
60,000 W peak — 60 kW, which Stark markets as 80 hp. That figure is the same on both the Varg MX 1.2 and the road-legal Varg EX; the two bikes share a powertrain and differ on wheel torque (978 N·m on the MX, 1,036 N·m on the EX), lighting, and legality rather than on output. For scale, a Sur-Ron Storm Bee peaks at 22,500 W and an Ultra Bee at 24,500 W, so the Varg makes roughly 2.5x the peak power of the biggest Sur-Ron — and still only matches it on stock top speed, because 68 mph is a gearing and aerodynamics limit, not a power limit.
What's the difference between the Stark Varg MX and the Varg EX?
The MX 1.2 ($11,990) is the closed-course race bike: no lights, 68 mph published, 50 miles claimed. The EX ($13,040) is the road-legal enduro on the same 60 kW powertrain, with factory lighting, slightly more wheel torque (1,036 N·m), and a plating path where your state allows it — which is why it scores 97 to the MX's 95 on our board. The catch worth knowing before you spend $13,040: Stark publishes neither a top speed nor a range figure for the EX, and we leave both blank rather than borrow the MX's numbers.
Which is faster, a Stark Varg or a Sur-Ron?
It depends what you mean. On outright top speed they are effectively tied in stock trim — Sur-Ron publishes 68.3 mph for the Storm Bee against the Varg's ~68 — which is itself the interesting part, since the Varg makes nearly three times the power. Top speed comes from gearing, not watts, and the Varg is geared for motocross drive; regeared for speed it runs far past both. On acceleration the Varg's 60 kW crushes any Sur-Ron. So: the Varg is dramatically quicker, and neither is meaningfully faster flat-out as delivered.
