The short answer
Two full-size 21/18 enduros, a point apart on our board, and $899 between them.
- Buy the Arctic Leopard XE Pro S ($5,100, Score 92) if you want the lighter, cheaper bike. It is 51 lb lighter, and that is the difference you feel every time the bike is not upright.
- Buy the Talaria Komodo ($5,999, Score 91) if you are a heavier rider, want the bigger engine, or want a manufacturer that publishes its terms.
The Score gap is one point. The weight gap is 31%. Decide on the second one.

Verified product photo

Verified product photo
Comparison table
Head-to-head spec winners
- Real range not published by listed sources
- Real range not published by listed sources
Awarded spec rows
1-3
Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro vs Talaria Komodo
| Spec | Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro | Talaria Komodo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 20 kW peak | 32 kW peak | Talaria Komodo+12 kW |
| Top speed | 63 mph | 65 mph | Talaria Komodo+2 mph |
| Battery capacity | 4 kWh | 4.4 kWh | Talaria Komodo+414 Wh |
| Real range | Not published | Not published | No winner awardedNeeds both published values |
| Weight | 165 lb | 216 lb | Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro51 lb lighter |
| Brakes | Dual Hydraulic | Dual Hydraulic | TieSame Dual Hydraulic |
| Suspension | Full | Full | TieSame Full |
| Warranty | Not published | 12 mo | No winner awardedNeeds both published values |
| Delivered price | $5,100 street + shipping unknown | $5,999 street + shipping unknown | No winner awardedShipping unknown |
Power
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- 20 kW peak
- Talaria Komodo
- 32 kW peak
Top speed
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- 63 mph
- Talaria Komodo
- 65 mph
Battery capacity
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- 4 kWh
- Talaria Komodo
- 4.4 kWh
Real range
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- Not published
- Talaria Komodo
- Not published
Weight
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- 165 lb
- Talaria Komodo
- 216 lb
Brakes
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- Dual Hydraulic
- Talaria Komodo
- Dual Hydraulic
Suspension
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- Full
- Talaria Komodo
- Full
Warranty
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- Not published
- Talaria Komodo
- 12 mo
Delivered price
- Arctic Leopard XE Pro S Enduro
- $5,100 street + shipping unknown
- Talaria Komodo
- $5,999 street + shipping unknown
Score breakdown
Power
/22 pts
Range
/20 pts
Chassis
/18 pts
Value
/15 pts
Support
/12 pts
Ergonomics
/8 pts
Versatility
/5 pts
The 51 pounds
165 lb against 216 lb. These are both full-size bikes with the same wheel sizes, and one of them weighs almost a third less.
Weight is the spec that changes what a bike is like to own rather than to read about. It is what you feel picking it up off the ground on a hill, catching a slide, lifting the front over a log, or loading it into a truck alone. Power you use in bursts; weight you carry the entire ride.
The Komodo spends those pounds on real things — a bigger motor, a 97.2V system, a slightly larger pack — and if you want that engine you are buying the weight that comes with it. But a 51 lb difference between two bikes in the same class is unusually large, and it is the honest headline of this comparison.
The core matchup
| Arctic Leopard XE Pro S | Talaria Komodo | |
|---|---|---|
| VoltRipper Score | 92 | 91 |
| Price | $5,100 | $5,999 |
| Peak power | 20 kW | 32 kW |
| Continuous power | not published | not published |
| Wheel torque | 600 N·m | 754 N·m |
| System voltage | 72V | 97.2V |
| Battery | 3,960 Wh | 4,374 Wh |
| Top speed (claimed) | 63 mph | 65 mph |
| Claimed range | 50 mi | 71.5 mi |
| Weight | 165 lb | 216 lb |
| Seat height | 34.3 in | 35.8 in |
| Front / rear wheel | 21 / 18 | 21 / 18 |
| Max rider weight | not published | 353 lb |
| Power modes | not published | 4 |
| Warranty | not published | 12 months |
Head-to-head, factor by factor
Weight and handling → XE Pro S, decisively. 51 lb is not a trim difference, it is a different bike to manage. The lower 34.3-inch seat compounds it for shorter riders.
Power → Komodo, decisively. 32 kW against 20 kW and 754 N·m against 600. Note that neither manufacturer publishes a continuous figure, so both headline numbers are peak bursts you cannot check. The gap between them is real; the absolute values are marketing until somebody instruments them.
Battery and range → Komodo. A 4,374 Wh pack against 3,960, and a 71.5-mile claim against 50. We hold no real-world figure for either, so treat both claims as low-speed best cases — across the bikes where we do hold both numbers, real range averages about 59% of the claim.
Rider weight → Komodo, and this one is decisive if it applies to you. Talaria publishes 353 lb, the highest rating in our catalog. Arctic Leopard publishes nothing for the XE Pro S. An unpublished limit is not a generous one; it is an unknown one, and it cannot be checked against your own weight in gear.
Published support terms → Komodo. Four power modes and a 12-month warranty, both stated. Arctic Leopard publishes neither for this bike. On a $5,000 machine that is a real difference in what you are buying.
Price → XE Pro S. $899 less, and it is the lighter bike. That combination is why it takes the Score by a point despite giving up 12 kW.
Which should you buy?
- Most riders who want a light full-size enduro → Arctic Leopard XE Pro S ($5,100). Cheaper, 51 lb lighter, lower seat.
- Heavier riders, or anyone who wants the bigger engine → Talaria Komodo ($5,999). The 353 lb rating and the 12-month warranty are the things the spec sheet gives you that the Arctic Leopard does not.
- You want Arctic Leopard's bigger bike → XE Pro R ($5,699) — 26.5 kW on the same chassis. (XF Pro vs XE Pro R →)
- You want the proven platform instead → Sur-Ron Ultra Bee ($6,499), which costs more than either and answers with the deepest support network in the class.
Not sure which fits your size and riding? Run the Find Your Ride configurator.
The honest bottom line
The Arctic Leopard is the better bike to ride and the Talaria is the better bike to buy blind.
The XE Pro S wins where it counts for most riders — lighter, cheaper, lower — and our Score reflects that with a one-point edge. But the Komodo is the only one of the two that will tell you how much rider it can carry, how many power modes it has, or what happens if something breaks in month eight. Arctic Leopard is a young brand whose dealers cannot reliably agree on which battery is in this bike, and that uncertainty is priced into the gap being one point rather than three.
If you can confirm the specs in writing before you pay, take the Arctic Leopard. If you are ordering on trust, take the Talaria.
VoltRipper is independent — we don't sell Arctic Leopard, Talaria, or any bike, and our Score is based on verified specs, not who pays us. Affiliate disclosure is included on monetized pages, and we're spec-verified/data-driven rather than hands-on until first-hand testing exists.
FAQ
Should I buy the Arctic Leopard XE Pro S or the Talaria Komodo?
If weight and price matter most, the XE Pro S — it is $899 cheaper and 51 lb lighter (165 against 216), which is the single biggest practical difference between them. If you are a heavier rider, want more power, or want published support terms, the Komodo — it makes 60% more peak power, carries a 353 lb rider rating, four power modes and a 12-month warranty, none of which Arctic Leopard publishes for the S. They finish a point apart on our board, 92 to 91.
How much lighter is the Arctic Leopard XE Pro S?
51 pounds — 165 lb against the Komodo's 216. That is a 31% difference on two bikes that both run full-size 21/18 wheels, and it is what you feel picking the bike up, correcting a slide, or lifting the front over an obstacle. It is also why the XE Pro S edges the Komodo on our board despite making considerably less power.
Which is better for a heavier rider?
The Talaria Komodo, and it is not close on the evidence. Talaria publishes a 353 lb maximum rider weight, the highest figure in our catalog. Arctic Leopard publishes no rider weight limit for the XE Pro S at all — and an unpublished limit cannot be checked, which for a heavier rider is a disqualification rather than a footnote.
Which has more power, the XE Pro S or the Komodo?
The Komodo, by a wide margin — 32 kW peak against 20 kW, and 754 N·m of wheel torque against 600. Neither manufacturer publishes a continuous power figure, so both headline numbers are peak bursts with nothing to measure them against. Treat the gap as real but the absolute figures as marketing.
Do either of these come with a warranty?
Talaria publishes a 12-month warranty on the Komodo. Arctic Leopard publishes no warranty terms for the XE Pro S that we can find. That difference costs nothing on day one and can cost a great deal in year two, and it is a large part of why the two finish only a point apart despite the price and weight gap.