Head-to-head
Riding Times GT73 vs Apollo (RFN) RFN Ares Rally Pro
Apollo (RFN) RFN Ares Rally Pro leads on current VoltRipper Score, but rider fit, legality, budget, and support still decide the smarter buy.
| Bike | Score | Price | Peak power | Battery | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riding Times GT73 Trail - Beginner | 63 | $2,298 | 2.4 kW | 1.7 kWh | budget dual-battery range, casual off-road and path riding |
| Apollo (RFN) RFN Ares Rally Pro Trail - Intermediate | 85 | $4,799 | 12.5 kW | 2.6 kWh | power-hungry riders, a higher-peak-kW Sur-Ron alternative |
What works
- Bigger 19-inch wheels and dual 48V batteries (1,747 Wh) make it more usable than most sub-$2.5k e-dirt-bikes
- Well-equipped for the price — full suspension, dual hydraulic disc brakes, a 5-inch LED display and lighting
- Widely sold (Amazon + many dealers) and UL 2849 certified
Trade-offs
- A generic model resold under many labels (Riding Times, Bootime, TST, ENGWE) — no single accountable brand or aftermarket
- Pedal-equipped fat-tire e-bike at heart, not a purpose-built dirt bike like a Sur-Ron
- Range claims (68–155 mi) are pedal-assist/low-speed fantasies; expect far less on throttle
What works
- Marketed as a 'Sur-Ron killer' — 12.5 kW peak 'rocket mode' is big power for the money
- Large removable battery, fast charging, and a headlight for kit-based street use
- Adjustable suspension and tortoise/rabbit ride modes
Trade-offs
- Newer brand with a smaller aftermarket than Sur-Ron/Talaria
- Top-speed claims vary widely (46–55 mph) — verify the exact model
- Range claim (100 mi) is an eco figure; expect far less ridden hard