Head-to-head
79Bike Falcon M vs E-Ride Pro SS 2.0
E-Ride Pro SS 2.0 leads on current VoltRipper Score, but rider fit, legality, budget, and support still decide the smarter buy.
| Bike | Score | Price | Peak power | Battery | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79Bike Falcon M Trail - Intermediate | 66 | $3,699 | 8 kW | Not published | riders who want style + performance, Sur-Ron-class trail on a budget |
| E-Ride Pro SS 2.0 Trail - Intermediate | 81 | $3,999 | 12 kW | 2.9 kWh | best power-per-dollar, heavier riders |
What works
- Distinctive retro/scrambler styling that stands out from the Sur-Ron/Talaria crowd
- 72V, 8 kW peak and a 50 mph top speed in a light ~130 lb package
- Fastace fork and a growing parts catalog
Trade-offs
- Battery capacity is under-published on the M vs. the Pro — confirm Ah before buying
- Smaller aftermarket and support than Sur-Ron
- Off-road only; no street kit as sold
What works
- 12 kW peak and a 60 mph top speed — big power for under ~$4,000
- 72V/40Ah (2.88 kWh) swappable Samsung pack; ~2 hr fast charge
- 300 lb rider limit and regen — accommodates bigger/heavier riders
Trade-offs
- Claimed range only holds at low steady speed; expect ~35 mi ridden hard
- Smaller aftermarket/support than Sur-Ron or Talaria
- Off-road only; no street kit as sold